Robinhood Chain · creator fees

Your fees are already yours.
They're just still in there.

Paste a wallet. See every token it launched and what each one is still holding for it.

No wallet. No signup. Reads are free.

scroll — why it's in there

$0

creator fees earned per day

across the launchpad tokens we sampled

$0.0M

addressable daily volume

excluding the launchpad's own token

0%

goes to the token's creator

snapshotted per token at launch

0

launchpad tokens in the top 100

of 83 unique tokens checked

Measured on 2026-09-01 by matching every token in the chain's top 100 against the known launchpad factories. Not a projection — and it will drift as the chain moves.

Why it sits there

The money exists. The screen doesn't.

Every token launched on this chain locked its liquidity permanently and started charging a fee on every swap. Most of that fee belongs to whoever deployed the token. Almost none of it gets taken out.

01

The money never lands in a wallet

Fees accrue inside a permanently locked position. They sit there until somebody calls a function to move them. No transfer arrives. No notification exists.

02

Most creators launched once and moved on

They watched the chart, then went to the next thing. They have never called that function. A large share do not know the function exists.

03

Nothing answers the only question

There is no screen anywhere on this chain that tells a wallet how much is in there right now. Not the launchpad, not the explorer, not a tracker.

04

Claiming is manual, per token, with no memory

One call per token, no reminder, no history. Even the creators who know about it forget between refills.

05

Every tool here serves the other side

Existing products are built for liquidity providers — people being asked to deposit. Nobody built anything for the people already owed.

How it works

Three layers. You only pay for the third.

Reading is free forever, for any address, including addresses that will never pay us. Claiming it yourself is free too. We charge for the plumbing that means you never have to remember again.

01free · no wallet

The mirror

Read any address

Paste a wallet. We list every token it launched and simulate a claim on each one to get the exact amount waiting. No connect, no signup, no signature.

02free · 0%

The pull

Claim it yourself

Connect, press claim, the fees land in your wallet. We take nothing here and the button says so. We are a button.

033% of what moves

The drain

Let it empty itself

Point your fee wallet at our splitter once. From then on the pile drains on your schedule and forwards to you automatically.

The drain

One transaction in. One transaction out.

Opting in points your fee wallet at our splitter. That single act is the whole onboarding — and the same single act, reversed, is the whole exit.

1you sign

You opt in

One transaction from your own wallet, pointing your fee wallet at our splitter.

2we pay gas

Keeper triggers

We pay the gas and call the drain. The contract refuses if your threshold is not met.

3atomic

Split and forward

97% to you, 3% to us, in the same transaction. If the forward fails the whole thing reverts.

4unilateral

You can leave

Point the fee wallet back at yourself. One transaction, your wallet, no permission from us.

What the contract guarantees

  • The splitter's balance is zero at the end of every transaction.
  • Your share transfers before ours, in the same transaction.
  • The fee is capped at 3% by a constant that cannot be raised.
  • No function can send funds to an address you did not set.
  • No owner withdrawal path exists over creator funds.
  • It is immutable — no proxy, no upgrade key, no admin pause.

Asking anyone to route income through our code is a real request. It is why the splitter is immutable and why an independent audit is a launch gate rather than a later milestone.

Economics

Cheaper to hold than to pay.

The only demand argument we make is arithmetic you can check against your own chart in thirty seconds.

Run it on your own token

$
Swap fees at 1%$500.00per day
Your share at 70%$350.00per day

What we take, by tier

OPEN
$10.50
BRASS
$7.00
IRON
$3.50
KEEPER
free

Dropping from OPEN to IRON saves $210 a month. If 1% of supply costs less than about a year of that, holding is simply cheaper than paying — and you are long the token your own volume buys back.

Manual claims stay at 0% at every tier. This only prices the automated drain.

Tiers

OPEN3%

hold nothing

  • +Unlimited free reads
  • +Manual claim at 0%
  • +Alerts on 1 wallet
BRASS2%

0.25% of supply

  • +Alerts on 5 wallets
  • +Buy-back route unlocked
IRON1%

1% of supply

  • +Unlimited watched wallets
  • +Deepen-liquidity route
  • +Read API key
KEEPER0%

3% of supply

  • +We run the plumbing free
  • +Priority keeper slot
  • +Integration line

What the token may never do

  • Buy a bigger share of anyone's fees
  • Buy a faster drain or preferential ordering
  • Pay a rate of return, in any form
  • Gate access to somebody else's fee flow

Nothing that touches somebody else's money is for sale. The token lowers the rate on our own service and opens our own tooling — that is the whole of it.

Revenue

Where the money comes from, including the part nobody admits.

A protocol asking creators to route fee income through its contract cannot be coy about its own fee income.

01

Auto-drain cut

3% of fees we actually move, dropping to 0% by tier. Never on principal, never on manual claims, zero when nothing moves.

02

Launchpad revenue share

Partners embed our read widget and take a share of our cut on creators they send. Costs margin, buys default placement.

03

Read API

Free tier stays generous. Paid keys for dashboards and trackers, billed in the token and burned.

04

Our own creator position

The token's own swap fees, disclosed openly. At this chain's size this is the larger line, and pretending otherwise would be the lie.

The uncomfortable number

At this chain's current size the automated cut is a small business — roughly a few hundred dollars a day at realistic adoption. The larger line is our own creator position on the token. Both are on-chain, both get disclosed, and the cut is recycled entirely into buying the token back.

Auto-drain cut

100% → buyback

weekly, every hash published

API revenue

100% → burned

billed in the token

Creator position

funds operations

so the cut can stay pure

Roadmap

A census can kill this in a week.

Before a line of product is written we count what is actually unclaimed chain-wide, against a threshold decided in advance. Writing the number down first is what stops us rationalising a bad one.

Phase 0
The census3-5 days

Count every launchpad token and sum the unclaimed creator share chain-wide. A written go/no-go threshold, decided before measuring.

Phase 1
The mirror1-2 weeks

Read any wallet, shareable links, leaderboard. Zero contracts deployed, zero custody, zero risk.

Phase 2
The pull1 week

Connect and claim at 0%. Receipt cards. Still nothing of ours in the money path.

Phase 3
The drain3-4 weeks

Splitter written, audited and published before the first opt-in. Keeper on an isolated host. Alerts bot.

Phase 4
The tokenlaunch week

Fair launch into a working product. Tier discounts live the same day. First buyback inside seven days.

Phase 5
Routes and reach2-3 months

Buy-back and deepen routes, launchpad widget, every launchpad on the chain, paid read API.

Contract facts

ChainRobinhood Chain · id 4663
GasETH
Supply1,000,000,000 · fixed, no mint
LaunchFair launch, 0% team allocation
LiquidityPermanently locked at launch
Our splitterImmutable · no upgrade path
Splitter balance at restZero, by construction
Fee cap3%, a constant in code

What we measure

  • WETH moved on behalf of creators, cumulative
  • Read to connect conversion
  • Repeat claim rate at 30 days
  • Auto-drain opt-ins — and opt-outs
  • Chain-wide unclaimed total, which we want to FALL

What we deliberately ignore

  • Total value locked — we hold nothing, so there is none
  • Holder count as a health signal
  • Page views without a wallet read

Honest take

The risks, in the same size type as the pitch.

If the case only works when the risks are hidden, it isn't a case.

What is genuinely strong

  • +The category is empty — every tool on this chain serves liquidity providers, not creators.
  • +The read needs no indexer: the locker already lists tokens per wallet.
  • +Onboarding is one transaction the creator sends from their own wallet.
  • +Exit is one transaction we cannot block, delay or charge for.
  • +The census compounds into a dataset a later competitor cannot backfill.

What could kill it

  • The launchpad could ship a claim button any week. This is the largest risk, not a footnote.
  • Everything here depends on this chain staying alive. A major launchpad on it has already gone dark once.
  • Redirecting fee income is a real act of trust. Without a published audit, nobody should do it.
  • Measured take-rate revenue is modest at today's chain size. It scales with the chain, not ahead of it.
  • Fee splits are set by a third party and already moved once, from 90/10 to 70/30. They can reach 50/50.

Contract address

PRE-LAUNCH
TBA — not launched yet

$VAULT has not launched. Any contract claiming to be it right now is fake. The address will appear here and on our own channels first.

Check a wallet. It costs nothing.

Yours, a friend's, or the deployer of whatever you bought this morning. No wallet, no signup, no signature — and if there is money in there, it was always theirs.

Read a wallet